Questionable Motives

December 23, 2009

Why should we be against the UN resolution against the defamation of religion?

The United Nations General Assembly has handed yet another victory to Islamic states in their push to curtail freedom of expression out of “respect” for religious beliefs. On Friday (December 18, 2009) the U.N. General Assembly passed a resolution combating the so-called “defamation of religions.”

The “defamation of religions” resolution is both unnecessary and misguided.  It subverts longstanding principles of human rights law by empowering governments and clerics who seek to silence or intimidate religious dissidents, religious minorities and nonbelievers.  Existing international law already protects individuals from discrimination and from expression constituting incitement to violence.  UN experts agree that the concept of “defamation of religions” is an improper legal instrument for addressing the problem of discrimination based on religion. Asma Jahangir, the United Nation’s outgoing special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, has cautioned that resolutions targeting “defamation of religions” can be used to legitimize anti-blasphemy laws that “punish members of religious minorities, dissenting believers and nontheists or atheists.”

Fortunately, the General Assembly resolution is non-binding against U.N. member states.  Yet defenders of religious liberty and freedom of expression should not dismiss the resolution as meaningless.  A movement is afoot at the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva to incorporate the “defamation of religions” concept in binding international treaties. In addition, the General Assembly’s resolution gives cover and comfort to governments that stifle freedom of expression.  Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, for instance, carry mandatory sentences of death or life imprisonment, and are frequently used against members of the Ahmaddiya community, a peaceful minority Muslim sect. Ireland passed a law earlier this year imposing a €25,000 fine for “blasphemy” and empowering authorities to raid publishers suspected of harboring copies of “blasphemous statements.”  Earlier this year the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), the group backing the “defamation of religions” resolution before the General Assembly, incorporated the language of Ireland’s anti-blasphemy statute verbatim in a UN ad hoc committee resolution that would add the “defamation of religions” concept to binding international treaties.  The UN General Assembly’s non-binding resolution lends a patina of respectability to these and other anti-blasphemy measures.

From the CFI article here.


  1. The OIC is attempting to impose Islam’s blasphemy law upon the entire world. That law, codified in Reliance of the Traveller O8.7, prescribes the death penalty for any and all criticism of Islam.

    The primary examples of proscribed expression are Fitna and the Motoons. Contrary to Ban Ki-moon’s diatribe, those are neither hate speech nor incitement to violence, they expose Islam’s hate & incitement.

    If we allow the OIC attack on free speech to succeed, we will be rendered incapable of accurately and honestly discussing Islam, greatly increasing our risk of falling victim to it.

    For more information about the proposed protocol to ICERD, see this compilation of blog posts on the subject: Ad Hoc Cmte. for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards

    Comment by Dajjal — December 24, 2009 @ 3:09 am | Reply

  2. […] Why should we be against the UN resolution against the defamation of religion? […]

    Pingback by Questionable Motives — December 31, 2009 @ 4:57 am | Reply

  3. […] this month I posted an article here about a recent non-binding UN resolution put forth by the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) […]

    Pingback by Year end thoughts: Why is agnosticism so dangerous? « Questionable Motives — December 31, 2009 @ 4:58 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: