Questionable Motives

March 14, 2010

What’s this about the Pope housing a sexual predator?

Filed under: abuse,Catholic Church,child abuse,Conspiracy,Sex scandal,Vatican — tildeb @ 4:35 pm

Monsignor Charles Scicluna is the Vatican official in charge of prosecuting priests alleged to have committed serious sexual crimes. Isn’t that swell? The Vatican is now going to do something about this problem.

But wait. The pope housed a serial child abuser for years and reassigned that same abuser to another church where he spent more years abusing kids? Say it ain’t so!

“It’s true that there has been no formal condemnation,” Monsignor Scicluna said, adding: “It must be made absolutely clear that in these cases, some of which are particularly sensational and have caught the attention of the media, no absolution has taken place.”

Well, no absolution really is the key point here.

He also addressed accusations that the Vatican was obstructing justice by hiding reports of abuse, saying that

“secrecy during the investigative phase served to protect the good name of all the people involved; first and foremost, the victims themselves, then the accused priests who have the right — as everyone does — to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty”.

But he said Church secrecy had

“never been understood as a ban on denouncing the crimes to the civil authorities”.

No indeed. No ban at all. The officially approved Vatican directive by Ratzinger for both victims and those accused to stay silent on pain of excommunication can hardly be considered a “ban,” now can it? The church simply has no problem whatsoever with senior people like the pope when he was cardinal of Munich and Grafing house a serial offender for two and half years for highly effective ‘therapy’ who was then appointed by this same cardinal who now just so happens to be pope to serve as a priest in Grafing for an additional three years abusing more kids! What’s the big deal? It’s not like it’s the pope directly aids and abets child rapists.

No, no no. Let’s be very clear: the real problem here is “those who have tried, with a certain aggressive persistence, in Regensburg and Munich, to look for elements to personally involve the Holy Father in the matter of abuses.” he said.

It is those who are asking hard questions (and finding evidence) – of collusion between the institution we call the Church, its executives, and its agents who committed sexual crimes against children – is the real problem here… not the crimes that were committed nor the parties that aided and abetted in the cover-up of those crimes. Got it.

But perhaps we should suspect that when the Vatican’s prosecuting official is the same person defending the Grand Pooh Bahs from responsibility from their executive decisions and actions, then we have a conflict of interest. Although I am sure that the Church and all its leadership is absolutely blameless in allowing centuries of historical child abuse and sexual crimes to be committed by thousands of its priests and deacons and sisters, it borders on the miraculous that there was so little the church could do to stop the abuse and bring these criminals to justice. This must be another one of those Great Mysteries used to explain how god works through the catholic church in our world.

So we should all be good little catholics and stop asking hard questions and let the Grand Pooh Bahs do what they do best: remain perfect and blameless in all things.


  1. It’s all part of God’s plan… (doh).

    Comment by misunderstoodranter — March 14, 2010 @ 8:29 pm | Reply

  2. Hey, you deleted my post again….I proved to you this article is incorrect!

    Comment by 4amzgkids — March 18, 2010 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

    • I deleted nothing from you, 4.

      Comment by tildeb — March 18, 2010 @ 9:19 pm | Reply

      • Your post with the three articles appears here.

        Comment by tildeb — March 19, 2010 @ 10:44 am

    • This commentary is neither “incorrect” nor do your linked articles ‘prove’ otherwise. Oh, they offer us an apologetic opinion that the church is mostly blameless and that those who harp on the secrecy and thwarting of criminal investigations by the Vatican are really mean people and that we should pay them no mind. Thanks for that viewpoint, but I will stick with holding those responsible for morally bankrupt policies – that as an institution aided and abetted the continuous and grievous harming of children – culpable.

      In addition, and in spite of sanctimonious apologies and excuses to the contrary, supporters of the catholic church should either step up to the moral plate and hold their leadership accountable for their collusion wrapping the raping of children by clergy in a cloak of secrecy or suspend their support of this religious monstrosity unless and until the policies are withdrawn. For defenders of the faith to do otherwise I think is morally reprehensible and ethically indefensible.

      Comment by tildeb — March 19, 2010 @ 11:05 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: